APPLING OF SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES ON THE UNITED KINGDOM GEOGRAPHY DOMAIN

Authors

  • Otman Gandi Faculty of Information Technology, Alasmarya Islamic University, Zliten, Libya
  • Mohammed Mawloud Faculty of Information Technology, Alasmarya Islamic University, Zliten, Libya
  • Majdi Alashhb Faculty of Information Technology, Alasmarya Islamic University, Zliten, Libya

Keywords:

RDF Schema, SPARQL, UK GEOGRAPHY

Abstract

Websites play an important role in accessing huge data and information on the World Wide Web. The problem with the Web is that Web pages are used to present data and also to refer to another Web page as a complete page and not as data identified on that page by URLs (Website identifiers), which leads to the repetition of the indicated data, which leads to the utilization of the infrastructure in non-ideal and inefficient ways. Hence it was necessary to describe the data and information on the web in multiple ways to be accessible. The Semantic Web was developed to solve this problem by referring data by other data. In this paper semantic web techniques such as Resource Description Framework (RDF), Standard Protocol and RDF Query Language (SPARQL) and Web Ontology Language (OWL) were used to describe and store data in database also invoke specific data from this vast amount of data and then represent a complex and huge information from invoked data. Semantic web technologies have been applied on a specific domain which is United Kingdom geography. The protégé software has been used to implement semantic web technologies on the United Kingdom domain and after entering data about the target domain and describing this data and information in more than one way, it became possible to execute queries on it, and the result when executing the query in different ways was to obtain the required information about this domain.

References

] Allemang, D., & Hendler, J. (2011). Semantic web for the working ontologist. Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann/Elsevier.

Cambridge Semantics,. (2014). OWL 101. Retrieved 2 January 2016, from http://www.cambridgesemantics.com/semantic-university/owl-101.

W3schools.com,. (2016). XML RDF. Retrieved 2 January 2016, from http://www.w3schools.com/xml/xml_rdf.asp

Kil, H., & Nam, W. (2013). Semantic web service composition via model checking techniques.IJWGS, 9(4), 339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijwgs.2013.057466

FIRAT, M., & KUZU, A. (2011). Semantic Web for E-Learning Bottlenecks: Disorientation and Cognitive Overload. International Journal Of Web & Semantic Technology, 2(4), 55-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.5121/ijwest.2011.2404

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

APPLING OF SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES ON THE UNITED KINGDOM GEOGRAPHY DOMAIN (O. Gandi, M. Mawloud, & M. Alashhb , Trans.). (2022). Journal of Basic Sciences, 35(1), 175-192. https://journals.asmarya.edu.ly/jbs/index.php/jbs/article/view/134

Similar Articles

1-10 of 12

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)