Ibn Hisham Responses to interprets & Arabisers in his Book Mughni AlLabib

A Linguistic and analytic study Selected Samples

Abstract

   Since the grammatical responses and objections had a great role in formulating the grammatical rule and the diversity of opinions based on evidence in it, and thus the emergence of diversity in grammatical schools, we decided to study some terms that deal with the objections and responses in the book that is one of the most important books of grammar, namely (Mughni al-Labib) by Ibn Hisham, and we chose some of these objections in the book on Ibn Hisham's response to some of the arabisers and interprets only. We studied them linguistically and analytically. We presented the opinions of the grammarians and linguists in it to find  how Ibn Hisham's objections were correct or not and his response to them ; We did not follow (Al-Mughni's) methodology - Chapter of  Individual Issues – Chapter of  the Sentence; because the studied issues varied in terms of number and thus the inequality between the chapters. a The results of the research showed that Ibn Hisham's responses to the arabisers and interprets did not have the merit of taking precedence over them, as it was a disputed  issue  throughout the ages, and Ibn Hisham diversified  in the use of terms. Sometimes he used; What is soft  like (an oversight, and what is correct and otherwise), and sometimes he used what is hard, such as (illusion, false), and that when Ibn Hisham responded to some of the interpreters and arabisers, he did not depend on other grammarians opinions, and did not mention the sources on which he based his opinion.