THE JUSTIFICATION WITH NOUNS IN ARABIC BETWEEN THE STRUCTURE AND THE CONNOTATION

AN APPLIED ANALYTICAL STUDY OF SAMPLES FROM THE HOLY QURAN

Abstract

The research aims to examine how the Arabic language employs nouns for reasoning, revealing the semantic secrets behind the compositional diversity of that formulas and applying that to the Quranic text. The analytical and interpretation approach for those syntactic and semantic rules was used to achieve the article goals. The findings revealed that the nouns used for reasoning either be an explicit source, an authoritative source, or some other nouns such as the demonstrative nouns, derivatives, some adverbs, and the nouns that accompany the addition. Justification by using explicit source "Mansoob" on causation is the origin. Besides, what the grammarians have said that the original justification is using" لام التعليل" and then be accusative on its omission is not accurate because it is not based on linguistic documents prove their opinion. Most likely, the description by the accusative infinitive is not employed except when it expresses the meaning of abstract justification without any other semantics.  In addition, the study found that there are authoritative sources that refer to reasoning (justification) without mentioning it clearly which are (كي) and the verb after it, أنْ، والفعل), (أنَّ، واسمها وخبرها)), (ما، والفعل) and there are two interpretations for أنْ والفعل according to what it comes after it which means (اللام) for the general reason if it what comes after it is a past verb, and means (لئلا) if what comes after it is a present verb.