Jurisprudential differences between males and females in the chapter on purity

a collection and comparative study

Abstract

The research dealt with important matters that concern a Muslim in his life, which are the jurisprudential differences between males and females. The research aims to define the jurisprudential differences in language and terminology, and collect the jurisprudential differences between males and females in the chapter on purity, and explain the rulings related to them between males and females, especially in the chapter on purity. . The problem of the research lies in collecting the jurisprudential differences between males and females, and asking: What are these jurisprudential differences between males and females in the field of purity? What are the sayings of the jurists regarding each group? It is studied as an independent jurisprudential study so that it is easy to refer to it. I divided the research into an introduction and two sections. The introduction includes praise and praise for God Almighty and prayers and peace be upon His Messenger, may God bless him and grant him peace, the reasons for choosing the research, its importance, its objectives, the problem of the research, its limits, and the approach followed in it. The first section includes the introduction and includes the definition of differences, jurisprudence, and purity in the language. And the terminology, and the issue of the ruling on the urine of a boy and a girl, and the issue of the ruling on circumcision for both sexes and the difference between them. The second section includes the issue of ablution and its method for both sexes, the issue of ablution thanks to the woman’s purification if she does it independently, and the sayings of the jurists on each issue, and the most correct among them.