Responsibility incurred in the occurrence of a criminal offence

Abstract

This study addressed the issue of error committed under Libyan law, where  The problem of the study revolves around the extent to which it contributes to the error committed in the European Union or its absence  Responsibilities are on the perpetrator when there is a common fault on the part of the perpetrator and the victim  But the victim's fault is the perpetrator's fault, which leads to the victim's death  The laws prescribed for man were mentioned, but these laws were not mentioned in them Taking responsibility takes time. Through this study, he admitted to us that we realize the reality of being immersed in error The responsibility for entering it falls within the discretion of the trial judge, and that the error case is verified Which aims to sever the causal link in what happens between the offender's action and the result The committed crime, and that the defense that the victim takes the perpetrator’s action is considered a defense Through this study, we succeeded in achieving recognition of the state of hooked absorption  The responsibility for entering it falls within the discretion of the trial judge, and that the error case is verified  Which aims to sever the causal link in what happens between the offender's action and the result  The committed crime, and that the defense that the victim takes the perpetrator’s action is considered a defense Joya is committed to censorship and responds to it. It also seems to us that the Libyan legislator was not prevented from taking into consideration the victim’s fault Due to the new culprit's mistake, the Supreme Court was the one who decided this issue and decided to remove it especially.