Moderation in Controversial Issues

Coupling of the genitive pronoun without returning the sewer as a Model

Abstract

The grammatical disagreement is a linguistic phenomenon that is worthy of study and research, because it touches the basis of Arabic, which are its provisions and evidence - on the one hand - and it includes most of its issues - on the other hand. This research studies those issues between the Basrians and the Kufis. They were spaced between them until many of them reached the point of blatant contradiction in terms of obligatory and abstinence.
This work made the issue of coupling of the genitive pronoun without returning the sewer as an example to clarify the intermediate trend that these issues should be, as the opinion of each team supported by its varied proofs.
At the end, I concluded my approach by easing both sharp views; instead of saying "obligatory of returning the sewer and preventing coupling without repeating it", which is the Basrians' approach. I believe to say rarely possible and presented proofs for this moderate attitude.      
I saw the saying of frequent repetition, and instead of saying the absolute permissibility - which is the opinion of the Kufis. I believe in little permissibility, and I mentioned the evidence of supporting this intermediate stance.
In this intermediate judgment, it is a respect for the opinion of both parties together, and taking into account their proos, with no excess or negligence.
I would argue that if this intermediate approach is taken into account in these controversial issues, all of them - or at least most of them - would turn into consensual issues.
May Allah help us all.