Nitrate Removal (NO3-) from Different Sources of Water by Laboratory-Scale Reactor Biofilters with Anaerobic Condition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59743/jmset.v4i1.83Keywords:
Biofilm, Biofilter, Nitrate, AnaerobicAbstract
The aim of this study was to identify the pollution of (NO3-) for some different water sources, whether surface or groundwater. The study included (3) water sources from lakes collected behind some dams or valleys. As well as the number of (13) sources of groundwater wells and the depths of these wells ranging from 10-200 m, and from concentrating the nitrates in the water. Designed a laboratory treatment unit for the purpose of bio-removal of nitrates, this unit operated under a Vertical Flow Biofilter (VFB), and a unit operating under the anaerobic system, with the use of support materials inside the unit (gravel and PVC). To grow bacteria and the form of Biofilm, the unit was operated under a Hydroelectric Retention Time (HRT) for 4 days. The samples were collected every four days from the treatment unit. The results showed that nitrate concentration is significantly higher in groundwater than in surface water, with a concentration ranging from 0.7 to 190 ppm. Finally, nitrate disposal after treatment reached (76.1%).
References
Abdalhafida M.A., and Al-Mobark M. (1992). Microorganisms practice, Al-Dar Al-Arabiya for Books, Beirut, Lebanon [In Arabic].
Al-Ghariani A.S. (2002). Phenomenon of high concentration of nitrates in the waters of the field of District of Gabal Alhsone. Technical report, Project of Man Made River, Libya [In Arabic].
Alia T., and Salman F. (2014). Study of some quality indicators of drinking water in some drinking water resources in Syrian coastal area. Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Biological Sciences Series, 36(4): 9-21.
Belaid S.M. (1999). Evaluation of Groundwater in the Quadrilateral Reservoir in District of Jafara , General Authority for Water, Tripoli- Libya.
Bourgues S., and Hart B.T. (2007). Nitrogen removal capacity of wetlands: sediment versus epiphytic biofilms. Water Science and Technology, 55(4): 175-182.
Droycon Bioconcepts Inc. (2002). Environmental Technology Verification of the SRB-BARTTM tester for the detection and evaluation of Sulphate Reducing Bacteria in water. Technical report, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Eaton A.D., Clesceri L.S., Rice E.W., Greenberg A.E., and Franson M. A. (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st ed., American Public Health Association, American Water-works Association, Water Environmental Federation.
Gomez M.A., Galvez J.M., Hontoria E., and González-López J. (2003). Influence of ethanol concentration on biofilm bacterial composition from a denitrifying submerged filter used for contaminated groundwater. Journal of bioscience and bioengineering, 95(3): 245-251.
LNCSM (Libyan National Center for Standardization and Metrology) (2009). Libyan specifications for drinking water (82). Tripoli, Libya.
Rafid I.A., and Ben Aisha M. (2015). Removal of Heavy metals (Lead) by Sulphate Reducing Bacteria (SRB) from Harvesting Water at Lake Wadi-Kam-Libya. Scientific Dialog (Proceeding of Seminar), compilation of scientific research activity for Medical Technology, University of Tripoli, 1:11-18.
Rittmanm E.B, and McCarty L.P. (2001). Environmental Biotechnology: Principles and Applications. McGraw-Hill, Biological Sciences Series, Singapore.
Sigunga D.O., Janssen B.H., and Oenema O. (2002). Denitrification risks in relation to fertilizer nitrogen losses from Vertisols and Phaoezems. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 33(3-4): 561-578.
WHO (World Health Organization) (2011). Nitrate and nitrite in drinking-water, Background document for development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality.WHO Press, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Marine Sciences and Environmental Technologies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.