The legal ruling of sale of drunken

(a comparative jurisprudential study)

Abstract

Praise be to God, Lord of the Worlds, and may blessings and peace be upon the Master of Messengers, his family, his companions, and those who follow them until the Day of Judgment. As for after: The study of drunken selling aims to clarify the essential nature, conditions and legal rulings of drunkenness, in terms of validity and enforceability. This is beneficial to all people, as selling is a necessitated prevelation and everyone must buy and sell. Among these people are those afflicted with drunkenness. Is the contract with them valid? Is it binding on them? Or not? It is necessary to know this. In this research, I followed the complete inductive and then analytical approach. I clarified the issue and pointed out the points of disagreement and agreement. I mentioned the opinions of the jurists regarding the point of disagreement and then the reason for the disagreement. Then I mentioned the evidence by discussing it, then I preferred what I saw as preferable. This was the case in the four well-known schools of thought along with the school of Ibn Hazm al-Zahiri. I documented this from reliable sources. I divided research into three sections: The first section: Definition of sale of drunken. The second section: The validity of sale of drunken. The third section: The necessity of sale of drunken. The research results were as follows: 1 –The drunken contracts are a complex issue that concerns many people, especially given the wide variety and abundance of intoxicants available to young people, and the increasing number of users. It is with greater reason to differentiate between a drunk who does not have the ability to distinguish and a drunk who has the ability to distinguish.  - A drunken who lacks discernment is in the same situation as an insane person.  All actions of a discerning drunken are valid. - A drunken selling is subject to his approval after his intoxication subsides.