Peer Review Policy

Journal of the Academic Forum operates a double-blind peer review system to ensure impartial evaluation of all manuscripts. Each submission is reviewed by at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field.

Key aspects of our peer review process include:

• Objective evaluation of the manuscript's scholarly contribution
• Adherence to confidentiality and anonymity
• Constructive feedback and timely communication with authors
• Editorial independence in final decisions

All peer reviewers are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest and to report any unethical practices observed during the review.